Talk:Standard Catalogue of British Coins

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 15 March 2023 by reviewer Onel5969 (talk · contribs).

Numismatics

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

{{refimprove}}[edit]

@BoyTheKingCanDance: Admittedly the article has but one reference, but if you follow the link given, you will notice that this reference covers (in longer form) all the content of the History section up to the <ref> tag, but unfortunately not the latest info I added thereafter; that latter I gleaned from Amazon, but did not consider that a quotable source.
What's more, when you web-search for the catalog title, you get loads of antiquarian offers but virtually no descriptive text. So would you consider removing the {{refimprove}} tag? (Perhaps it would help to include for illustration a photo of a heap of such catalogs from different years that I have at my disposal, though such photo yet needs taking, while observing copyright issues.) Thanks, HReuter (talk) 11:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HReuter:, thanks for taking time to post this wonderful explanation. I think you’re right. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{orphan}}; {{refimprove}}[edit]

@Umakant Bhalerao: Thank you for pointig out the orphan status, as far as links from other articles are concerned. So far, I have now added links from the Coin catalog and Spink & Son articles, plus minor fixes in the latter. However, apart from links coming from other articles, please note that – not immediately visible – the present article is being referenced from every single file in c:Category:Coins_listed_in_the_Standard_Catalogue_of_British_Coins, i.e. 118 at the time of writing and roughly counted 400+ by the time all relevant coin images have been tagged with the {{SCBC}} template, a work in progress.
As to the {{refimprove}} tag, I understand this issue has already been resolved in the previous discussion paragraph.
So would you kindly consider removing both the {{orphan}} and {{refimprove}} tags? – Thanks, HReuter (talk) 22:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Drafts moved from mainspace}}[edit]

@Onel5969: Two further, independent references as well as another illustration have been added, documenting the leading role of the subject catalogue in its field and its 60+ year history. Kindly consider to remove the improvement templates and to relocate the article to mainspace. (As mentioned above, it is referenced by numerous images in Commons.) Thanks, HReuter (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]