Talk:Species Traitor

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Anarchism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

🚨🚨 Join our active cleanup drive for the month of May – all are invited 🚨🚨

Good article nominees

03 May 2024 – Mariano R. Vázquez (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
15 Apr 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion

Peer reviews

01 Mar 2024 – Gaetano Bresci (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

08 May 2024 – Draft:Cherepanov, Donat Andreevich (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c)
05 May 2024 – Draft:No Pasarán!: Antifascist Dispatches from a World in Crisis (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Fianticolonial (t · c)
undated – Draft:Grass Roots Books (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC
05 May 2024 – Draft:Mirna Wabi-Sabi (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Overlookedn (t · c) was deleted

Cleanup (350) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (506)

bias[edit]

This article is clearly biased in favor of the rather stupid, completely marginal views put forth in Species Traitor. It says of the first issue, "In retrospect, while having some good articles, it was no less of an introductory-feeler issue." Who thinks it had "some good articles"? The fan who wrote this article? Malcomc 19:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one objects, I deleted that sentence, though others could try and make the article approximate the NPOV. Malcomc 19:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I object to your whole questioning of the article since the language you use is inflammatory and certainly carries with it many POV's. I think someone unfamiliar with the work but familiar with wikipedia would be better suited to criticize this entry seeing as how your personal bias is completely negative towards it and I don't see how that is any better than the "fan who wrote the article". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.95.246.84 (talk) 21:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Word. 72.21.196.64 (talk) 16:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malcomc, you are truly a contrarian. I've seen you (on many occasions) dwell on articles which grate against your preconceived ideological framework/s. "Stupid", the word you use, is hardly "neutral" (however it is that we are defining that term around here). Also, your claim that this journal expresses "completely marginal" views requires some proof. Where are the studies proving your claim? Were those studies peer-reviewed? R4Cobordism 01:32, 2 May 2008