Talk:Social equilibrium
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Untitled[edit]
Society is then not like weather where small change results in big variation. Small change in math./comp. model ..... (I presume it has) Has this equllibrium something to do with punishing the excess or "evil" (someone stealing, cheating, lying ...) even when there's no big benefit (there are some studies, although they may be influenced by people knowing they are studied and behaving better !!!) ?
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References[edit]
How does the second reference contribute to the article's lead section? Shortieex (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC) @Alfgarciamora:
- I agree. To add, the first reference is not even a reference. The link takes you to a page that merely states the name of the book. Not a good reference. Rroja042 (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with you @Rroja042 about the reference not being a good one. When I clicked on the link the page was a Google Books page in another language. I also noticed that of the three sentences that were each different claims, the other two had no references or supporting information to back that statement being claimed. I found the ==Further Readings== section interesting. perhaps those readings could be some of the basis for references? Cherr023 (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC) @Alfgarciamora: