Talk:Siljan Ring

A fact from Siljan Ring appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 July 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Siljan Ring, a very large impact crater in central Sweden, has been the site for two attempts at commercial exploitation of natural gas and oil based on the theory of abiogenic petroleum?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siljan Ring.

Wikipedia

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Siljan Ring is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Late Devonian extinction#The Kellwasser event|Kellwasser Event]] The anchor (#The Kellwasser event) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

DYK nomination[edit]

lead (introduction) vs main content sections[edit]

See WP:LEAD. The present lead is not a summary of the main content - it could be seen as a summary of content that is waiting to be written in more depth, that lacks a summary of the actual "content" section (Geology). Either the lead should be converted to a section and a new very brief smmary written, or the sections corresponding to the lead should be added (and a summary of the Geology section added to the lead). Boud (talk) 02:29, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]