Talk:Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen

Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 18, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 October 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the first half of the 19th century, the Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen continued Polish parliamentary traditions in the territories of the Prussian partition?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen.

Wikipedia

European history: Polish history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Polish history task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Focus on early decades[edit]

While Jedruch does not say so explicitly, it is likely that the numbers and competences he describes are true only for the pre-1848 period. (He does not that this time period is the primary focus of his chapter). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:23, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chris troutman (talk · contribs) 03:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
~~I'm deeply concerned that this article relies so heavily on one source. I'm not sure if that is a fatal defect. I'm going to ask for a second opinion. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
I haven't seen much English-language writing on this subject. This covers the major aspects discussed in the literature. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
I think images from the commons could be used, even if somewhat tangential. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Heavy reliance on a single source is permitted for GA. More sourcing will be required for A-level and FA review. While I would like to see images, there aren't any that are exactly applicable to the topic and therefore not per se necessary. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]