Talk:Sebastian Kneipp/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 17:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- I propose to take on this review. Before reading the article through in detail I notice that the opening paragraph and bullet points do not constitute a lead as advocated in the MoS. This part of the article could be rewritten to provide an introduction to Kneipps' activities, but a proper lead section needs to be added at the beginning that summarises the information in the rest of the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
It is disappointing that nobody is available to make the necessary improvements to this articles. In general, it meets the GA criteria and is well cited, but it does not comply with the MOS guidelines on structure and layout, so I am failing it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)