Talk:Scouting in Washington, D.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

May I suggest that the Goshen Scout Reservation be left as it's own article and the descriptions of each camp placed within it? Pajari 04:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • That can be done right within this article without splitting or making new stubs. --Chris 04:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Districts[edit]

  • these are no longer the current districts. I do not know what the new alliment is I only know my old troop is district two rivers was redistriced and renamed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.65.54.68 (talkcontribs) 21:41, 5 June 2006
  • Does anyone know if this is correct? --evrik (talk) 20:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I changed MD, and DC districts to reflect new names, not sure whether or not to keep old names. NCAC seems to change district names every few years. Marauder40 (talk) 14:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

This page is a complete mess. Why has EVERYTHING been merged (some of it seems to be haphazardly merged). Why is Camp Goshen shoved into this article along with everything else? It should remain it's own page if not for jsut the sake of allowing a easy to read flow of information. Was there a reason for this? A Council, council camp/reservation, or OA Lodge may have its own article if it meets standard wikipedia criteria for having its own article. After work, which looks like I'll do, Goshen Scout Camp will probably warrant it's own page again, if not to get rid of the clutter. I overreacted. I'll fix up the Goshen section to look good. Radagast83 14:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think we should split out the Goshen Scout Reservation out of the article, and reverse the damage caused by the merge. --evrik (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • It looks like someone did it. --evrik (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't see why we can't just include Goshen here... Longbowe (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page rename[edit]

How did it get changed? Where was it discussed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.110.250.158 (talkcontribs) 21:47, 8 April 2007