Talk:Scia'new First Nation

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Becher vs. Beecher[edit]

Proposed change to this page[edit]

As I write this, a google search for "beecher bay" scia'new [1] estimates "About 4,780 results", and a google search for "becher bay" scia'new [2] estimates "About 935 results".

I have not yet been involved in any debate about this nomenclature. I have no significant ties to BC nor to native issues. I came across a red link to Becher Bay on the Klallam page, which, as part of Did You Know, is linked to from the Main Page right now. (Here's the archived version, in case you're reading this in the future.)

I'm here because I think we can safely say

The Scia'new First Nation or Becher Bay Indian Band or Beecher Bay Indian Band

Although one of them may be more correct, it appears both are used. In particular,

the Te'mexw Treaty Association

http://www.temexw.org/WhoWeAre.htm

and the provincial government

are seen here to use the spelling "Beecher". In fairness, the first link and the last link have the same verbatim text.

Proposed change to other pages[edit]

I suspect this debate belongs on the talk pages, rather than in the articles themselves, so until the naming debate (if there is one) can be resolved, it might be beneficial to replace the contested spellings, on other pages, with Scia'new First Nation, Scia'new Nation, or Scia'new, as the case may be.

--Mathieu ottawa (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and made the change because of WP:BEBOLD, on this page (but not others). --Mathieu ottawa (talk) 23:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]