Talk:Satellite (Bebe Rexha and Snoop Dogg song)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ZombiUwU (talk · contribs) 02:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Iaof2017, I will be conducting this GA review. I'll ping you in a few days when I have a completed review or have most of it done. I'll be doing it in chunks so you'll see me adding some stuff as I go. Also - I'll be doing some copyediting as I go, so please check my edit logs and revert anything you disagree with. I look forward to working with you. FYI this might take a few days. Thanks! ZombiUwU ♥ ^{(🌸~♥~ 📝)} 02:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ZombiUwU do you intend to continue this review? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As both nominator and reviewer are inactive, I am closing this GA nomination. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General Comments[edit]

Lead[edit]

Background and composition[edit]

Reception[edit]

Track listing[edit]

Charts[edit]

Release history[edit]

Music video and promotion[edit]

Source and Citation Spot Check[edit]

Plagiarism check[edit]

No obvious plagiarism [1]

Chart[edit]

My chart of many things

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.