Talk:Samson/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Katolophyromai (talk · contribs) 22:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will go ahead and review this article, which I had never edited until yesterday when I made three minor edits involving the placement of images and the text in the captions. I have noticed that the nominator MagicatthemovieS has never edited this page and does not appear to have conferred with any editors who have prior to nominating it, which is an inconvenience because it means it is unlikely that he can be relied on to implement changes or adjustments. As such, I will try to implement minor adjustments myself, since I wrote a lengthy essay about Samson a year ago and I think I know enough about him to make those adjustments if necessary. Nonetheless, I will try to leave off any major changes to other editors who have been active at this page. --Katolophyromai (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have ended up making a lot more contributions to the article than I ever anticipated; I greatly expanded the lead, as well as the "Interpretations," and the "Cultural influence" sections. I also switched out a large portion of the images, cleaned up bare urls, and added a lot more citations. I do not think I would have passed the article in the state it was in before I modified it, but now I think I am comfortable doing so. --Katolophyromai (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·