Talk:Sam Clemmett

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sam Clemmett article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 August 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Notability[edit]

Andrew Davidson, again, it is very poor form to keep removing deletion templates without bothering to give why in your edit summaries and not responding to requests for discussion. Boleyn (talk) 21:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PROD, "PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected." It is clearly inappropriate in cases like this and peremptory removal is therefore to be expected. If you want discussion then please use WP:AFD instead. Andrew D. (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Davidson, basic edit summaries and discussions are expected long before AfD. Instead you have pursued articles moved to draftspace by me, and then articles edited by me, and moved them straight back to mainspace without the slightest attempt to address the issues or explain your reasons. Really poor editing. Boleyn (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to improve[edit]

I think it would be so much better with a picture 75.181.59.106 (talk) 16:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]