Talk:Safran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:SAFRAN.PNG[edit]

Image:SAFRAN.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was} do not move Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Safran to SAFRAN: was a {{db-move}} "Company appears to use all caps for its name, per its website (04:59, 26 March 2009 User:BillCJ). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Safran" is not an acronym. See WP:MOSTM. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Or move Safran to Safran (firm) and Safran (disambiguation) to Safran? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see the problem with spelling a word the way the company does. We have many other articles like that aren't acronyms, many of them French companies. So a guideline has more weight than a company;s on preference? So why we have eBay, and not Ebay? Is "eBay" not a trademark too? (I don't think it's an acronym.) The guidelines are inconsistent on this, giving preference to some styles over others. My prefernce is still SAFRAN. Hopefully wil get a consensus on this one way or the other. Also, Safran Group is probably a better alternative than Safran (firm), though theterm is not quite as common as "SAFRAN" on their site. - BillCJ (talk) 10:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again, see WP:MOSTM. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I heard you the first time. I heard you the first time. - BillCJ (talk) 21:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also the guidelines are not inconsistance relating to eBay because it is covered by a specific exception in the MOSTM. Trademarks beginning with a one-letter lowercase prefix pronounced as a separate letter do not need to be capitalized if the second letter is capitalized, but should otherwise follow normal capitalization rules. ebay is even used as an example. SAFRAN is not covered in this specific exception so the naming of ebay is irrelevant to this discussion. To get this moved you will either need to prove that this is an acronym, is pronounced as a as seires of letters like MCI or get a consensus at the WP:MOSTM talkpage to capitilis the names of comapnaies if they do so though I highy doubt there will be a consensus for that. --76.65.141.61 (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • All that is needed to override a guideline is a consensus here. Looks liek that won't happen, but I had to try. Yes, Apple I know, "Again, see WP:MOSTM." Screw the guideline - it's STUPID. - BillCJ (talk) 21:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. As mentioned above, the name is not an acronym. --DAJF (talk) 13:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per MOS:TM. We don't bow to trademark owners wanting to circumvent standard English. If you see other articles that violate this, nominate them to be moved instead of using them as a reason to have more bad article names. TJ Spyke 19:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose move, yes it's a simple case of MOS:TM. The question of primary meaning is a closer call, I'm sceptical that this really is one. The appeal to other instances is empty without specific examples; Provide these, and maybe we'll review the guideline and/or apply WP:IAR, but without them the response must be as above: Fix them too. Andrewa (talk) 20:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:MOSTM. The General rules section reads "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official": avoid: REALTOR®, TIME, KISS; instead, use: Realtor, Time, Kiss." The title does not need a disambiguator either. None of the other entries at Safran (disambiguation) are only Safran. — AjaxSmack 23:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Unless the firm is a very dominant meaning, plain Safran should be the disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Safran is the only meaning. All of the others are people or titles in the form of XXX Safran. — AjaxSmack 16:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Hmmm, I guess there's a precedent of sorts in Suzuki. But I'm not convinced... if there were only one town called Robertson, and all other uses were either qualified by prenames or less notable (or both), I'd still want the disambig to stay at the unqualified name. Hmmm.... are there better examples? Andrewa (talk) 19:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • Just to add that there are not many people surnamed Safran and none are particularly famous to the point where significant numbers of users would type "Safran" in the search box expecting to find one of them (in contrast with Churchill, Marx, &c.). — AjaxSmack 00:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Safran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Safran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Safran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New name for Zodiac Seats US LLC[edit]

  • Comment - I heard that the new name for Zodiac Seats US LLC is Safran Seats USA LLC. Is this true? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming Zodiac Seats U.S. to Safran Seats[edit]

Please visit Talk:Zodiac_Seats_U.S.#Requested_move_4_December_2018 to discuss moving Zodiac Seats U.S. to Safran Seats. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Safran&oldid=1207390440"