Talk:Sabrina (1995 film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Sabrina movie.jpg[edit]
Image:Sabrina movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Good job on Plot[edit]
I just want to say that whoever wrote the Plot did a very fine job. BMJ-pdx (talk) 08:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Somewhat misleading financials[edit]
This article states: "The film was not a box-office hit, with a result of US$53 million." While U.S. box office was indeed $53 million, the worldwide total was $87 million (as indicated in the sidebar). It is a bit hard to fathom how it cost $50 million to make as it didn't have expensive special effects or tremendously expensive looking sets, but it did appear to clear almost $40 million worldwide so it was pretty successful in the end. We've always liked it - in fact, better than the Bogart-Holden-Hepburn version (although we admit William Holden's performance is very good). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.131.188 (talk) 19:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Who holds copyright of the film?[edit]
I just submitted a still frame image from the movie to IMDb -- one of the iconic stairsteps in Montmartre -- but I couldn't include any copyright info because I don't know who actually holds the copyright on the movie. Perhaps only the lawyers know for sure :), but if you do, please let me know here. Thanks -- BMJ-pdx (talk) 08:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)