Jump to content

Talk:SM UB-13/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS): - the sentences in the lede are quite short and staccato, but this is a personal preference that makes me note it, I think...
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): - I'm particularly taken with the three images here; a nice variation between different topics.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: - well done! Shimgray | talk | 19:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]