Talk:SMS Meteor (1865)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: - wonder if you've lost track of this? Parsecboy (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.
Prose -- copyedited a bit so let me know if I altered meaning accidentally; otherwise no concerns.
Structure -- in keeping with similar articles.
Detail -- seems sufficient for GA-level; no obvious or major gaps.
Images -- licensing looks fine for second image but I believe we need a US PD tag for the top one.
Referencing -- fully cited and no concerns with ref reliability; one formatting issue that I dealt with.
Summary -- ready to pass, just the image tag needed I think. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Ian - I'd think the {{PD-US}} tag should work, as I don't think anyone would argue that Parlow was painting more than 22 years after he died ;) Parsecboy (talk) 12:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)