Talk:Ruth Barcan Marcus

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Logic / Ethics / Analytic / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Logic
	Ethics
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Ruth barcan marcus (talk · contribs) / Marcus, Ruth Barcan This user has contributed to the article.

Sexism[edit]

Hmmm......I often wonder whether sexism has something to do with the fact that Marcus extraordinary work is so throughougly minimized and she is largely undiscussed in the the halls of academic analytic philosophy. We all know that Kripke and other males did the REAL thinking after all. No??? (0; --Lacatosias 15:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're on about (or were on about four years ago), you can't read any (decent) text on modal logic without mention of the Barcan formula. Careful with that axe, Eugene. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 02:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lacatosias, a few points;

1. You presume gender is an issue for everyone within the halls of academe. It is not.

2. You presume Marcus' work was not marginal. I do not know. I found her while studying Computer Science.

3. You presume her (lack of) noteriety to be somehow bound to her gender. Highly improbable either way.

4. You have introduced bigotry into an academic article. Oh for shame!. You have victimized Marcus by way of your bigotry.

5. We are Men and Women, you know, People. Referring to people as 'males and females' is callous (rude) and pedantic.

6. NPOV.

7. 'extraordinary work', 'thoroughly minimized', 'largely undiscussed' ; all of this is rhetorical.

50.72.137.1 (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]