Talk:Ruhrstadion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RewirpowerSTADIONRuhrstadion — I'm pretty certain that the common name in English for this ground is still the Ruhrstadion. The sponsored name is only temporary, anyway — Dancarney (talk) 14:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support - standard practice on English Wikipedia is to use non-sponsored names where possible. - fchd (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per fchd. Besides, a quick Google search for rewirstadion -ruhrstadion turned up only 39,900 hits, compared to the 84,200 hits for ruhrstadion -rewirstadion. – PeeJay 21:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per FCHD and PeeJay. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - but for the right reason (frequency of usage), not for the myth of a non-existent "consensus". Knepflerle (talk) 00:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I would say WP:COMMONNAME applies here, considering the stadium's age and the relative recentness (is that a word?) of the sponsorship deal. Bettia (rawr!) 12:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.