Talk:Rosaryhill School

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Schools

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (280)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (992)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,324) • Stub-Class articles (6,692)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (399) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,242)

Copyright issue review[edit]

Some material was added in 2007, leading to the possibility that there was a reverse copyvio. However, using Wayback, the material added was in the external article in 2006, so clearly a case of copying from another source. (This doesn't eliminate the possibility that the same author write both, but even if that is the case, the external article was available first, so proper permission must be filed if it is the same author.

I removed the material.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 15:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A mess of promotional and copyright issues, with rafts of non-notables[edit]

The article will need a major housecleaning--appears to have been taken over by a few zealous accounts, adding layers of promotional content, with some copyvio for good measure. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed a lot of the promotional content and non-notable mentions. There are still scores of bold-face listings, and a lot of copy editing remains. For the moment I'm tapped out. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 02:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]