This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Isn't referring to the possible result of a proposed referendum in Denmark next year a little bit off-topic for the lead? — Blue-Haired Lawyert 18:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's only a short two section article at the moment, and the referendum doesn't fit into the "Background" or "Employment contracts" sections either, so where do you propose moving it to? It doesn't seem sensible to separate the discussion on the referendum from the paragraph where it's mentioned that Denmark currently does not participate and that the UK previously did not participate but decided to opt-in. If you want to move the discussion on who participates to elsewhere in the article, without fragmenting it, then go ahead and be WP:BOLD, but it will require some restructuring of the article. TDL (talk) 19:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
