Talk:Roland TR-909/Archive 1

Stylistic changes

The phrase "missed by a few miles" seemed overly editorial. Also, given that the "hihat" article redirects to "hi-hat", I am assuming that this is more standard. Lastly, the end of the first paragraph which stated that the TR-909 aimed for maximum possible realism is contradicted by the next paragraph's contention that sample-based machines were more realistic. Thus I have changed it to say "realism and cost-effectiveness". Mistercow 21:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• I would say, having owned one of these machines, that the manufacturer was going for a certain, processed acoustic drum sound (think Mick Fleetwood), believing that the end user wouldn't use these sounds front-and-center. (The machine would sound somewhat like a real kit if it wasn't up too high in the mix, and an analog tape machine would mask the sound quality of the low resolution samples.) I don't think cost effectiveness really was an issue (It was the top of its range when it was released, and the 909 has separate outputs for each 'drum', which is never cheap to manufacture.), but trends in music tastes and market preferences kinda blew Roland's plans for profit to bits, and not the digital kind. Yours with wikidevotion for all, Two Halves, not logged in

Impact On Music

There really doesn't seem to be much here on the role this piece of equipment has played within dance music - it has had an enormous impact obviously and this seems to be virtually ignored in this article. Perhaps someone better informed than me could write something - otherwise I might get around to writing it. Jim.

Neutrality

I added a neutrality tag at the top of the article because upon reading it, I noticed some of the article is biased. SquareShot97 20:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

There is a section on "other machines" which is pointless. For a start, the TR-909 wasn't even the first Roland machine to use this style of interface - and list of other brands which inherited this style is much vaster than suggested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.223.47 (talk) 22:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Notable Users

Is the "Notable Users" section really necessary for a machine like the 909? With entries like "Boys Noize"? Seriously? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.240.55.31 (talk) 11:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roland TR-909. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091012115722/http://free-drum-kits.com/free-drum-kit-roland-tr-909/ to http://free-drum-kits.com/free-drum-kit-roland-tr-909/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)