Talk:Rocket Lake

This page was proposed for deletion by Kj_cheetham (talk · contribs) on 19 July 2020 with the comment:
Based on rumours and speculative, WP:TOOSOON
It was contested by Hungariantoast (talk · contribs) on 01:27, 20 July 2020‎ with the comment:
Tiger/Alder/Meteor Lake, and Sapphire Rapids articles could be nominated for similar reasons. Let's wage wiki warfare if we want to go that far

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Intel (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Intel, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.IntelWikipedia:WikiProject IntelTemplate:WikiProject IntelIntel articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 750]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted.
[[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 730]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted.
[[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD P750]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Notability[edit]

User:Kj cheetham, there's sources out there, so curious why you would nom? Widefox; talk 09:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at things more carefully today, I'd have withdrawn the nom myself anyway to be honest. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is irresponsible to list "The Rocket Lake cores contain significantly more transistors than current Skylake-derived Comet Lake cores" when no sources are cited and Intel doesn't release transistor counts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.133.174.198 (talk) 07:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unscrupulous link suspected[edit]

The edition from 02:16, December 20, 2020‎ by 85.249.193.21 added a meaningless line after article content with a link to third party website that looks suspicious, possibly promotional or fishing. I'm not an editor so I don't know how to properly remove or hide it but I wanted to raise editors' attention to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avatar(DS) (talk • contribs) 21:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this 24 December 2020 edit by 103.104.114.71 which looks like EXT spam. Widefox; talk 16:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing Meltdown/Spectre[edit]

Does anyone know if Intel has finally managed to fully address in hardware the various Meltdown/Spectre variants? This would be a good category to tag against all the older "Lakes" as well as this one and any new ones until they finally get it right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.255.250 (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spectre class vulnerabilities are impossible to fix in HW, Meltdown has been fixed for several generations already. Also check Transient execution CPU vulnerabilities Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 11:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]