Talk:Robinson Bight

Canada: Newfoundland & Labrador / Geography / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Untitled[edit]

Read the above wikiproject information unless you are a BOT. There is a project in place for communities in newfoundland and Labrador and at present this is one of those communities and the only referenced information available, THAT is why there is a Stub label attached. Most of the communities are short on information and the research and writing is ongoing. WayneRay (talk) 16:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

added some refs, including some info and a link on the former colony. i think i have established that this qualifies as an article. i dont know how to incorporate them in an article, but here are the coords: 48° 6' N 53° 48', from [1] Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Mercurywoodrose for fixing it.

Explaining "no content" for WayneRay then. An "article" that constitutes solely of the title plus "existed in 1889" has -- quite obviously -- no content.

"Robinsons Bight existed in 1889."

Does that look coherent to you? Yes? Pick the next non-bot you have and throw that sentence at them and ask them to make sense of it.

A bight is a geographic feature, a bay, not typically the name of a town.
The community (a fact that the article did not bother to point out) "existed in 1889". Did it exist only in 1889? Did it exist before? After? Does it still exist?

Incoherent, right? Right. No need to get your undies into a knot. -- Fullstop (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]