Talk:Robert Malone (American football)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

You are censorious authoritarian propagandists. History will remember you as tyrants.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.255.153.27 (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

disambiguation[edit]

Could we have a disambiguation section here? There doesn't seem to be an entry for Robert Malone the biochemist, but hopefully we can get one of them soon. Pignut (talk) 11:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- He is not relevant because he speaks misinformation. Case closed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.0.151.183 (talk) 04:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 January 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: MOVE Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Robert MaloneRobert Malone (American football) – No clear primary topic with Robert W. Malone, who is often just called Robert Malone, so should be disambiguated at basename. If anything, Robert W. Malone is the primary topic. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nomination and likewise support creation of a Robert Malone disambiguation page that would list Robert W. Malone as well as Robert Malone (American football). —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 07:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Robert W. Malone gets 664,872 views compared with only 14,080[[1]] for the American footballer and per WP:SMALLDETAILS this is the simpler term most readers will use so it probably doesn't distinguish. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per above and Robert W. Malone as clear primary. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd be hesitant to say Robert W. Malone is a primary instead, given the subject is currently in the news and affecting view stats, so it might be better to revisit that question after we have some more time with that article existing, as it was created relatively recently. However, I think the proposed move is probably right.--Yaksar (let's chat) 14:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom - no comment on "is Robert W. Malone the primary topic", but a 2010s NFL player certainly is not. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.