Talk:Robert Broughton (activist)

This article was nominated for deletion on 03 March 2005. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 December 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Canada: British Columbia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Untitled[edit]

You can't remove comments from a talk page. I am reproposing the article for deletion and reporting you to an editor. Alexwoods 14:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the history of this page for comments previously deleted by Prescottbush. Alexwoods 15:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean to delete the whole article - I am reverting pending dispute resolution. Alexwoods 14:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alexwoods has libeled the subject of this article; see http://groups.google.com/group/alt.smokers/msg/fb70502ed6e162a3. He is certainly not objective on this subject ("didn't mean to delete the whole article" - yeah, right) and may or may not have something to do with the fact that Woods is employed a law firm that does significant work for Philip Morris. Prescottbush 15:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the page immediately after accidentally deleting it, my usenet comments are irrelevant to the merits of this article, and my employment has never had anything to do with tobacco. I am not aware that my employer does any work for any tobacco company. I did, however, first become aware of the topic of this bio, and the actual person hiding behing the username, due to his harassment of a usenet group that discusses smoking. I was surprised that he had a Wikipedia page, but that surprise went away when I realized that he has written it himself. Prescottbush has repeatedly violated Wikipedia policy in reposting a deleted article, posting a vanity page, sockpuppetry, and deleting other user's comments and proposals without justification. At the very least, he needs to explain his behavior. Alexwoods 15:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to do as John Broughton suggested on Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts, remove the speedy delete, and add the article to the Articles for Deletion list. Alexwoods 16:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to consider User:Prescottbush's disclosure of my place of work as a personal attack and delete it.Alexwoods 17:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated this for deletion. As the page was already deleted once, there is no space on the AFD page where I can give my argument for why this article doesn't belong on Wikipedia, so I'll summarize here (although most of the relevant points are in the section on Autobiography): the subject is not notable and the article is not verifiable or neutral. I look forward to discussing this. Alexwoods 17:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't understand the last comment. If you do an AfD, the nomination would (or should) show up as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Broughton (second nomination); plenty of space there. John Broughton | Talk 18:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it, I think there may have been some confusion between WP:PROD and WP:AFD -- the result was the old AFD being posted at WP:AFD. I made the second nomination page, and removed the other. Dina 00:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dina. That was the problem. Alexwoods 03:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The biography does NOT meet the Notability criteria. In addition, a brief visit to the Usenet Groups shows that this individual is arraogant and uses foul language against those who disagree with his views. Retention of his biography would be an injsutice to Wikipedia.

Wikijunkie88 01:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If all of the arrogant people were removed from Wikipedia, it would be much smaller. Prescottbush 06:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]