Talk:Rivergate Mall

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Rivergate Mall is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 19 October 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rivergate Mall → RiverGate Mall – The "G" in "RiverGate Mall" is capitalized on the mall's official website and on the mall's logo. BlueShirtz (talk) 03:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. VR _talk 12:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueShirtz and No such user: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BlueShirtz: See MOS:CAMELCASE – "RiverGate" seems to be a mere stylization, and unless it is consistently used in sources (which I doubt), we prefer the plain title case. No such user (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose No clear preference for RiverGate over Rivergate. --Spekkios (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, sufficient evidence that the "RiverGate" spelling is in wider use. Leasing info from the owners, news article, news article, news article. I have also found news articles as old as 2010 using the "RiverGate" spelling, which would suggest a long-standing precedent in favor of "RiverGate". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about [1][2][3]? Unless it's the wrong mall --Spekkios (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is why I said "wider" use. Some sources don't use it, but my searches tended to favor the camelcase spelling far more often than not. Between the current owners using it, the usage in a 2010 news article, and the fact that the previous owners were camelcasing it in 2000, I think there's just enough to tilt the scales sufficiently in favor of the "RiverGate" spelling. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Some of the commenters above seem to be prioritizing self-published promotional sources over independent reliable sources, which is contrary to Wikipedia guidelines. If the independent reliable sources are mixed, the policies and guidelines (MOS:TM & WP:TITLETM) say that the version that most resembles ordinary English formatting should be used. "Rivergate" is much more natural than "RiverGate". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – most sources seem to use Rivergate without the CamelCase. Per BarrelProof, that's what WP should do, too. Dicklyon (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.