Talk:River Tyburn

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

inappropriate link: Pictures external link[edit]

The "Pictures of the River Tyburn" link is for Tyburn Brook--the narrative refers to exploring the River Westbourne several times--yet the article says specifically NOT to confuse the two, and the article is about the one that is NOT part of the Westbourne.Lamabillybob (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted. Motmit (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antique shop claim[edit]

There doesn't seem to be any source that says the antique shop's claim is false so I don't think this opinion should be included per WP:SYNTH. Furthermore, I would suggest that an underground stream in this particular spot is extremely unlikely to be anything else. The water is probably clean for two reasons: firstly it flows downhill and joins the sewer at Mayfair a little further downstream [1]; secondly the river flows directly into the Thames at Vauxhall Bridge. Although raw sewage does occassionally enter the Thames I don't believe it's normal practice.[2] I don't know a lot about this but I imagine the river could be part of the sewage network, as a storm drain for example, without actually containing any raw sewage. --Lo2u ^{(T • C)} 16:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on, this is ridiculous. The onus is on the antique shop to back up its extraordinary claim, not us. Possibly this whole bit should be removed from the article as any shop could make such a claim. Especially as the linked sources do state that the Tyburn is linked to sewers. Donama (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's ridiculous. There are tourist guides that make the same claim so there's no shortage of reliable sources. Strictly speaking we don't need proof of the claim, only to reflect the reliable sources. I think common sense can also be applied. Is it really likely that there's a second, unrelated underground stream that flows at exactly the location of the Tyburn? Given that the river has a direct outlet into the Thames, is it really likely that it contains raw sewage, even if that was the case in a less hygienic age? --Lo2u ^{(T • C)} 07:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

still this nonsense in the article. English WP is the only to believe it. How can an open ditch be part of a water system that would be linked with sewers and stormwater drain, but then not flood the shop after rain, not stink and not have silted water? Live fish, hu? They do a great job to attract tourists and mislead guidebooks, but WP should only rely on real facts! 47.71.37.1 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]