This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
I have removed "This incorrect information has since been withdrawn. 0.99m is now agreed to be the highest known recorded level of the River Freshney since electronic monitoring began in 1985.", which was tacked on to the end of the hydrology section. There is no justification for calling a properly-cited source incorrect, just because it is no longer available on the net. I could as easily deduce that the electronic equipment was installed in 1985 because the previous equipment was washed away by the extremely high water levels. Bob1960evens (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have since found a secondary source for the same information. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
