Talk:Rihanna/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The9Man (talk · contribs) 07:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- The9Man (Talk) 10:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
@Trillfendi: Congratulations, the article has passed. - The9Man (Talk) 08:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Notes[edit]
Hi Trillfendi, I am going through this article but seems to verify a lot of things in this. Here are a few points which came up in my first read. Please have a look
1. Under Personal life
According to the New York Post, Rihanna filed a lawsuit against Peter Gunis and the firm Berdon LLP for $35 million in 2012 but settled out of court for more than $10 million in 2014.
For what?
Done There are rumors that he embezzled money from her or something like that.
2. Grammar and content under Personal Life
Rihanna dated Drake on-and-off from 2009 to 2016. In a January 2013 interview with Rolling Stone, Rihanna confirmed that she had rekindled her relationship with Chris Brown, though he remained under probation for the 2009 domestic violence incident. The confirmation followed persistent media speculation throughout 2012 regarding the pair's reunion.
The section not saying about the relationship details with Chris Brown before mentioning the rekindling. Also, Rihanna confirmed it in Jan 2013 but the following sentence says 'The confirmation followed persistent media speculation throughout 2012'.
- Done
- I also feel the opening sentence is inappropriate where it says, Rihanna is someone who has been recognized for embracing various musical styles and reinventing her image throughout her career. That is not her first identity; isn't it? It's my point of view than a problem.
- I will update with further points as an when I find them. - The9Man (Talk) 11:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
@The9Man and Trillfendi: This has not been updated since 30 May, despite you both being plenty active since then, where do things stand? Harrias talk 20:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Harrias: Somehow a month flew by without me realizing, but it hasn’t slipped my consciousness. I will get back to it tonight—Monday. If someone else wants to pick up where The9Man left off, that’s cool too. Trillfendi (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Harrias and Trillfendi: There were some delays in response in the beginning and later it skipped from my schedule. I am running tight these days and if someone can take over, that would be great. If that's not happening, I will take a look again in few days. - The9Man (Talk) 08:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- @The9Man: I just changed the status to 2nd opinion. Trillfendi (talk) 19:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Trillfendi I have changed few things myself to avoid a further delay. Now marking as Passed. - The9Man (Talk) 08:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @The9Man: I just changed the status to 2nd opinion. Trillfendi (talk) 19:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Harrias and Trillfendi: There were some delays in response in the beginning and later it skipped from my schedule. I am running tight these days and if someone can take over, that would be great. If that's not happening, I will take a look again in few days. - The9Man (Talk) 08:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)