Talk:Restore Our Future

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Would this go here, potentially; "Paid for by Romney for President, Incorporated."?[edit]

PolitiFact.com resource, regarding Mitt Romney on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012 in a Spanish-language radio ad ...

See Talk:Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 99.181.149.86 (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the pro-Obama super pack?[edit]

This article reads like a propaganda piece, it may certainly be completely true, but where is the balance? An unsophisticated reader would be lead to believe that only Romney's campaign is up to this sort of shenanigans. Goggling Priorities USA Action provides at least as many shady deals and politically incestious behavior. Priorities USA Action — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.98.208 (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a PAC supporting Romney. It has nothing to do with Obama. Any PAC supporting Obama would be the subject of a separate article. Just as an article about Alabama shouldn't mention Alaska "for balance," an article about a PAC supporting one candidate is not the place to discuss a PAC supporting an entirely different candidate. 96.245.116.174 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Priorities USA Action now has its own article. It's much shorter than this one, only a stub at the moment, but editors are welcome to expand it. Robofish (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]