Talk:Residual stress

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible source?[edit]

I pulled this from the EL section. It's not a legitimate EL, but looks like some of its subpages can be sources: http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/phase-trans/residual.html ``Wizard191 (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The measurement of residual stress is a constantly evolving science and improvements in the state of the art occur almost daily - this is important!! - links to updates and new developments should be on this page.Misterlobat (talk) 20:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is residualstress.com not a legitimate EL? It is non-commercial. What specifically is the exact issue with the link. Please give your reply in your words not a copy of the wikipedia rules as they are quite ambiguous. Rjd2008 (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Residual stress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314075123/http://www.aws.org/wj/sept01/cullison.html to http://www.aws.org/wj/sept01/cullison.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]