Talk:Rescue 911

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ratings[edit]

I compiled the ratings for each Rescue 911 episode for its original airing. I also added a table will the full season ratings and ranks. I was not able to find any quick, easy info on the full season ratings for seasons 1-3, so I used the 'ranking so far' number given by the newspapers on the week that the ratings season ended. Could someone who has access to a source that lists the full season ratings for all programs in 1990-1992 double check those rankings, and add the rating numbers? Allgood2000 (talk) 12:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue 911 and Australia[edit]

A few years back I read an article that claimed that calls to 999 declined as a result of Australians getting the emergency number mixed up because of the show. Can anyone in Australia confirm this? I wanted to add this tidbit to the article, but I am not sure. - Hoshie 05:34, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Read the post by user "kaleb777" on this page. It would seem that viewers were made well aware of the difference in numbers at the end of the show. While I'm sure some people still tried 911 out of confusion, it certainly wouldn't have resulted in any significant decline in 999 calls. JeffyP 20:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Emergency Number in Australia is 000 not 999 thats britains emergency number Mike Beckham 17:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rescue 911. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.odysseychannel.com/network/programs/index.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hallmarkchannel.com/tv/shows/index.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.realitytv.co.uk/index.php?section=OurProgrammes&l=pqr
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.uk.zonereality.tv/TV/Guide/Programme?letter=R
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.citv.com.au/shows/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]