A fact from Rector v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a fan sued Major League Baseball for $10 million after he was filmed sleeping at a game and the announcers allegedly made unflattering comments about him?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
I'm concerned about the title of this article. No reliable sources have called this case "Rector v. MLB". Is there any better title that could be used? Kevin (aka L235·t·c) 23:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Does "Rector v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media" sound like an acceptable title? Kevin (aka L235·t·c) 05:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would not oppose this new title. Yousou (Complain) 14:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved it. Best, Kevin (aka L235·t·c) 17:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"After the decision, legal practitioners" One person's opinion, unless you've got other sources.
Still an issue, attribute the position, don't handwave towards multiple "legal practitioners" Or even better yet, lose this sentence which seems to be a fringe position of one man on a blog as the article stands. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Both refs 15 and 16 have authors and publication dates available. Ref 10 has an author available.
Still an issue, see now also ref 8. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 2? Reliable or not?
Still don't think this is an RS. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 14 is explicitly about postseason tickets. This was not a postseason game.
I'[m really worried about the referencing here, which seems overly reliant on blogs for the analysis. Courcelles (talk) 01:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Last thing left appears to be the legal practitioners claim about deserving disbarment, which is sourced to one guy's blog. Courcelles (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
