Talk:Rapid serial visual presentation
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Advertisements are not welcome. -192.42.249.1 (talk) 00:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Requested move[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 06:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Matches the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 12:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Tony and WP:CAPS. Jenks24 (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support - uncontroversial, common name. Jojalozzo 16:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Extraneous external links[edit]
I removed the external links because they do not meet criteria per WP:EL or are dead links. Those that might serve as sources for future content are:
- http://www.semios.se/publications/evaluating_readability_on_mobile_devices.php Ph.D. dissertation about using RSVP on mobile devices
- http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=345309 More research
- http://news.com.com/Reading+phone+text+one+word+at+a+time/2100-1046_3-5785579.html Reading phone text one word at a time – CNET News.com
Jojalozzo 18:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Article should probably be deleted[edit]
This article should probably be deleted; it has been tagged as terrible for a long time, and it is the first result on Google. It doesn't make Wikipedia look good when this happens, and it appears nobody is ready to significantly clean up the article any time soon....
- 104.128.253.29 (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
I agree that this article is no good. I've deleted large portions of the text because they were either poorly written, or described fringe results that few people working in the area would consider to be important findings associated with RSVP 220.233.193.51 (talk) 01:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Learning[edit]
You can add different subject like medical or economic subjects 176.88.0.93 (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)