Talk:Rankings of universities in South Africa

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Overall page order of rankings[edit]

I would like to propose that we change the order of rankings on this page? Currently the 2010 CHET report is first, which is non-ideal in two ways: first, it's older than most of what's below; and second, if you read the cited report, it is actually not a ranking scheme at all, but a categorical one (i.e., it seeks to identify similar institutions, but not based on quality per se). So (for example) UKZN is in the "green" cluster because it show evidence of doing multiple things, rather than doing "red" poorly.

I propose that the most informative order would be:

Highly Cited Rankings First (THE World Univ Rankings, QS World Univ Rankings, ARWU/Shanghai) Filling in Detail (URAP) Business Reputation (THE Alma Mater, Tredence) Ancillary/context (2010 CHET Report)

Thoughts? 68.59.53.36 (talk) 22:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC) Was accidentally not logged in, but initial comments on order come from Joebyday (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...I was Bold, and went ahead and made this organizational change. Joebyday (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Times Higher Education rankings for South Africa in 2013[edit]

The table provided on the Wikipedia page for the Times Higher Education Rankings of SA Universities for 2013 is in error. Please refer to the table published on http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/world-ranking/region/africa:

The top African universities for 2012-13 are: University of Cape Town (ranked at 113 worldwide); University of Witwatersrand (226-250); Stellenbosch University (251-275); University of KwaZulu-Natal (351-400). UCTComment (talk) 14:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was some vandalism from yesterday which I have now reverted to the correct information. Thanks for pointing it out. - htonl (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Rankings[edit]

Is it possible for some editors to help me update some of these rankings? Some of them are dated for 2013??? JamieBrown2011 (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rankings are poor science[edit]

University Rankings are on so many Wikipedia University webpages, but they are based on poor science. The Higher education project is not a competition between institutions. Rankings do more harm than good, and I think that this should be mentioned. A few of the many readings