Talk:Ramos v. Louisiana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

Here are some sources that might be of use:

--Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 17:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14th Amendment[edit]

@Masem: Should we list the 14th Amendment in the infobox's "Laws applied" section, in addition to the 6th, since this deals with incorporation, or only the 6th as it already does? --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think in needs to, when reading the majority opinion as it talks heavily of incorporation. Let's put it this way: it can't hurt to have it there. --Masem (t) 22:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

retroactivity still at issue[edit]

 the ramos decision did not resolve whether it is retroactive.

scotus has granted cert to answer that question, but not yet heard argument or issued a decision. article should be updated with more info, by someone who knows more than i do.

see also https://old.reddit.com/r/scotus/comments/iajvo5/reposted_louisiana_111_murder_conviction_upheld/

47.248.134.91 (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)gtbear at gmail[reply]