Talk:Radiolysis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The sentence: "Of all the radiation-chemical reactions that have been studied, the most important is the decomposition of water." is the sort of vague, subjective statement that doesn't belong in Wikipedia, in my opinion. The "Citation needed" tag isn't enough. I am going to revisit this page shortly and remove the sentence unless I see convincing arguments here that it needs to remain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.88.202 (talk) 18:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is totally out of my area, but a major news source reported radiolysis as a possible source for possible life on the planet Mars: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011502222.html Chouhouzi (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion of hydroxide radical and hydrogen radical and hydroxide ion and hydrogen ion is either wrong or needs further explanation. This does not make sense. a hydrogen ion is H+ what is a hydrogen radical??? is it H3O+ ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.0.42 (talk) 16:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Szilard-Chalmers Effect be merged into Radiolysis. I think that the content in the Szilard-Chalmers Effect article can easily be explained in the context of Radiolysis, and the Radiolysis article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Szilard-Chalmers Effect will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. A merger was proposed by User:FoCuSandLeArN at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#New article. Plasmic Physics (talk) 03:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These are essentially different processes. A nuclear reaction does not necessarily produce, and is not necessarily caused by ionizing radiation. And an ionizing radiation is not necessarily related to radioactive decay or other nuclear transformations. BTW, when one sees a non-standard article title, as well as a dummy talk section header, a natural reaction would be to fix, both. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not knowledgeable on the subject, but perhaps the Szilard-Chalmers stub's contents are covered elsewhere. That's why I started the discussion in the appropriate WikiProject. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Give the very reasonable arguments against the merge by Incnis Mrsi, perhaps merging to Radioactive decay might be better, as this phenomenon describes a consequence of such decay and is small enough to be accommodated on the target. Klbrain (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Radiolysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Radiolysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radiolysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Radiolysis&oldid=1216084375"