Talk:Radio Rosa

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan status?[edit]

I have just linked to this article via a new article I created, Danish National Association of Gays and Lesbians. Is there others we could link it to? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherryleaf (talk • contribs) 20:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the criteria for Orphan status, and it seems that Radio Rosa is linked to more than 3 times within Wikipedia, so I have removed the tag. Of course, please just put it back on if that was actually in error! Cherryleaf (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]