Talk:R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Naming conventions[edit]

I think this double title in the articles name should be changed under our naming conventions. Put the article under one, make the other a redirect to it. R. v. Malmo-Levine with a redirect from R. v. Caine, or vice versa. The latter, of course, should never be a redlink even without fixing this to the proper article name. Gene Nygaard 02:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Put the categories in both; in the redirect, it used to work best if no line returns inserted, just on same logical line with redirect itself, not sure if that is necessary any more but do know that it works fine if you do it that way. Gene Nygaard 02:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]