Talk:RING finger domain

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Cell Signaling task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Untitled[edit]

I just moved the acronym into the first sentence, along with the refs. Richard☺Decal (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, think it was better with the acronym further down. RING doesn't really mean anything or add to anyone's understanding - It just makes things more confusing. Abergabe (talk) 22:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, I'm new to Wikipedia. I thought that the first line of articles were supposed to give its full name even if it is commonly known by its abbreviation? e.g. DED or APC2. Richard☺Decal (talk) 23:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the lead section style guide and it looks like the convention is to define the abbreviation in the lead sentence. Richard☺Decal (talk) 23:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But the fifth and final rule of wikipedia is to break the rules =P If it were anything with a useful acronym, I would entirely agree with you, but where the acronym is really just a matter of trivia, it just seems messy to put it in the opening. Abergabe (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this might read better, what do you think? Abergabe (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer to have the current style of RING (realling interesting new gene) finger domain in this case. But thanks Richard☺Decal for working on these pages. We appreciate help from new people :) Alexbateman (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the new version is much better. I didn't know how tightly we are supposed to follow convention. Richard☺Decal (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the WikiProject Cell Signaling banner to this page. I think that the RING finger domain can have a section (such as its function) dedicated to how it works mechanically in the signaling pathway, especially in regards to ubiquitin. MChapman5 (talk) 05:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Schematic[edit]

Is a non-ASCII art schematic available? Intelligentsium 16:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Intelligentsium: I'll hopefully get onto making something. Because I find ASCII art charmingly anachronistic, I'll paste it below for the record. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 05:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

                              x x x     x x x
                             x      x x      x
                            x       x x       x
                           x        x x        x
                          C        C   C        C
                         x  \    / x   x \    /  x
                         x    Zn   x   x   Zn    x
                          C /    \ H   C /    \ C
                          x         x x         x
                 x x x x x x         x         x x x x x x