Talk:Qaqun

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A fact from Qaqun appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 962 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Qaqun, a Palestinian village depopulated during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, had been continuously inhabited by Arabs since as early as the Mamluk period?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December.

Wikipedia

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To whomever changed the rating (anon IP) from stub to B-class, could you explain your reasoning? I think the article still needs more development myself, though it was more than a stub. Also, I'd like to raise the importance to medium in light of that (instead of high, since its now not a stub) so that it doesn't fall completely off the project's worklist radar. Tiamut 21:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Samaria"?[edit]

I wonder, is there really a reliable source for the claim that parts of the West Bank are called "Samaria" and "Judea"? To me, it appears to be Israel-specific (and thus POV) terminology. I suggest simply "The West Bank". MeteorMaker (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the 1948 part[edit]

I have now added (roughly) what Morris (2004) say about the 1948-events. He never mentions anything/any report about Iraqi attacs comming out of Qaqun! (And he normally mentions such "incidents") And it is abundantly clear that IDF wanted the area free of Arabs. Hmmm. Huldra (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guerin - to add[edit]

pp. 346-348 under the name Kakoun. Tiamut^talk 09:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Qaqun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414210538/http://www.un.org/unrwa/emergency/barrier/profiles/qalqilya.html to http://www.iaa-archives.org.il/zoom/zoom.aspx?folder_id=93&type_id=6&id=8373

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed dead 1931-link, Huldra (talk) 22:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]