Talk:Pyongyang Racer/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Panini! (talk · contribs) 15:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Aaaaaaaaaand here I go. Panini!🥪 15:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- 1. Well written?: Pass, Because there isn't too much out there to "write well" in the first place.
- 2. Verifiable?: Pass, All sources are verified reliable and spotchecks declare they back the content thouroughly.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: "Broad" is a funny way to put it, but Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: I think so, but it's worth a double check to make sure.
- 6. Images?: Pass, both non-free images are justified for use.
Not only is the article small its a relatively obscure one. As I desparetely tried to find sources that aren't in the article so I can "AHA!" you, I came back empty. I have very little to say, actually.
- Gameplay
- Source 2 doesn't mention anything about the controls, so it can be moved up to the comma after "Pyeonghwa Motors"
- Is there any information about what the stamps do? Or are they just collectibles?
- "They further have to avoid stationary vehicles. Colliding with these three times causes the game to reset." - These two sentences are short and, since they're referencing the same detail, can be combined.
- "There are no pedestrians." - In the vehicles, or in general?
- In general; clarified. Since several sources pointed this out, I thought I would do so as well. Do you think it is unnecessary to mention? IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- I think what you have here is fine. If multiple people mentioned this I think its fair to include if the critics also feel its important to mention.
- In general; clarified. Since several sources pointed this out, I thought I would do so as well. Do you think it is unnecessary to mention? IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- What did the leaderboard keep track of? I'm assuing the time it took to complete the tour, but the details would be helpful.
- Development and release
- I'd link Pyongyang the first time it appears in this section.
- It is already linked under Gameplay and "Highlight duplicate links" tells me not to link again almost as harshly as the game's traffic police tell you to follow the road. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- I double-checked this to make sure, because I could've sworn the counter reset after each double header. Maybe it has something to do with length? But anyways, yep, you're right.
- It is already linked under Gameplay and "Highlight duplicate links" tells me not to link again almost as harshly as the game's traffic police tell you to follow the road. IceWelder [✉] 17:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Looking at the Slate source, and how it credits this game's early popularity to internet culture, I would mention this detail here.
- Reception
- I got nothing. I mean, its a super small, poorly made game. Good Job!
- Miscellaneous
This was easy. Too easy. Since I have nothing else to shake a stick at I might as well do random spotchecks.
- Ref 2a, b, and c: Checks out
- Ref 7a: Checks out
- Ref 14: Checks out
- Ref 15a, b, and c: Checks out
Dang it. You thought of everything.
Welp, I tried. No, seriously, I really did. I even checked the categories, and I think Category:Video games developed in North Korea is pretty unnesecary. I doubt this will even count for the WikiCup... good job, fellow editor! Resolve these and its a support from me. I'll put it On Hold for now. Panini!🥪 16:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)