Talk:Pustków, Podkarpackie Voivodeship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pustków, Podkarpackie VoivodeshipPustków – In accordance with overwhelming majority of ext. sources, this should be the primary term with respect to usage. Few other villages in Poland called Pustków are highly unlikely to be the topic sought when a reader searches this term. Please, see the settlement's major World War II significance. Thanks. Relisted. BDD (talk) 22:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Poeticbent talk 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide proof for this claim (that this term is primarily used to refer to this village)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All citations describing Heidelager (in Polish, English, and German) with no exceptions (including numerous books), refer to this particular Pustków village. About 1,830 results in Google.[1]Poeticbent talk 14:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - yes absolutely all citations re the SS training camp at Heidelager will be for this, but pl.wp doesn't count any of these four modern settlements more notable than all the other 3. Can see this causing unneeded confusion if the helpful title is truncated. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pustków, Podkarpackie Voivodeship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal[edit]

  • Oppose on procedural terms. — There's plenty of material online (see: http://pustkow.republika.pl/historia.html) to create a brand new stand-alone article without removing important information from the history of this settlement. Please note, toponym „Dębica” does not appear in the reference; it's wp:original research. Also, in the English Wikipedia we do not use descriptive words in foreign languages when the English equivalent is readily available. "Truppenübungsplatz" simply means military training base, and "Poligon" is a Polish word which also means exactly the same thing. Poeticbent talk 15:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Poeticbent, Thank you for you comments. It wasn't original research on my part, I copied the name from one of the sources (while working on V-2 missile launch site, Blizna), believing that it was the official name for the camp. Anyhow, I get your point and will modify the name accordingly. Thanks for your input -- Marek.69 talk 06:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My original intention was to bring over information into an new article. I don't know why I used the 'split' template. I have now started the SS-Truppenübungsplatz Heidelager article. -- Marek.69 talk 12:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]