Talk:Puisne judge

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Puisne judge is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Merge proposal[edit]

I don't support the merging of the two articles. They deal with different subject matter. The fact that High Court Judges in England are called puisne judges does not make it automatic that the article should be merged into the puisne justice article. I would, however, suggest that "Puisne Judge" not be bolded in the High Court Judge article. Shadow007 00:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless someone can present a cogent argument within the next 48 hours in favour of merging the two articles I propose to remove the merge tag as it should not remain on pages indefinitely. Shadow007 23:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tag has been removed. Due to a lack of any cogent argument in favour of merger, the pages shall not be merged. Shadow007 00:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Court systems vs. Category:Court systems by country vs. Category:Canadian court system[edit]

Category:Canadian court system is a category within Category:Court systems by country is itself a category within Category:Court systems. — Robert Greer (talk) 23:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pronounciation[edit]

Is the pronounciation correct as shown on this page? I have never heard the Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada referred to as "Puny" but as "Puisine" with pronounciation as if it were spoken in French Canadian... RP459 (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Puisne judge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101212225655/http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/libweb/bhcjudges/bhcjudges.html to http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/libweb/bhcjudges/bhcjudges.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]