Talk:Public Protection Classification Program

@Zackmann08:Here's what I've got so far if you want to add anything to it. I'd like to push it into article space and have it go live. Maxwellwarner (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxwellwarner: my only comment would be avoid having headings that just have one sentence below them. Instead of:

===Membership===

*The department must respond at least four firefighters to structure fires. The chief may account for one of those required positions. 

===Training===

*The department must conduct at least two hours of training every two months for active firefighters.

Try this:

;Membership
:The department must respond at least four firefighters to structure fires. The chief may account for one of those required positions. 
;Training
:The department must conduct at least two hours of training every two months for active firefighters.

This second alternative will give you:

Membership: The department must respond at least four firefighters to structure fires. The chief may account for one of those required positions.
Training: The department must conduct at least two hours of training every two months for active firefighters.

Headings are for big sections. Does that make sense? --Zackmann08 (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up[edit]

One additional thing, I would work to get a bit more context in the intro. A good 4-6 sentence paragraph to open the page. I would also find some DOCUMENTED examples of notable departments with ISO ratings. Make sense? --Zackmann08 (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference links are broken[edit]

Both references lead to 404s. I tried to find updated versions of the documents, but couldn't find them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ergophobe (talk • contribs) 18:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]