Talk:ProScout

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.

Biased Much?[edit]

Wow, this article just reeks of being written by some sweaty ProScout grunt scrambling to save the company's shaky reputation. It would be nice if this could be rewritten objectively, preferably by someone not employed by ProScout.

68.77.20.73 (talk) 13:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a quick glance at the edit-history there appears to be some back and forth, where one editor adds a lot of unsourced contentious material that may violate WP:BLPGROUP and another adds a lot of promotional content. I've stubbed it for now and added it to my watchlist so I can revert any poorly-sourced content in the future. CorporateM (Talk) 16:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]