Talk:Priceless (2006 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

English title[edit]

Should this article be renamed to Priceless (film), since Hors de prix is the French title? Jeff-themovie (talk) 13:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shot with wrong ear bandaged[edit]

The shot with the wrong ear apparently bandaged is definitely through a mirror. If it wasn't, the watch would be on his right hand. GIrving (talk) 07:35, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priceless (2012)[edit]

There is another movie called Priceless (IMDB) released in 2012. -- 193.40.6.84 (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hatlink[edit]

I removed the "Not to be confused with Priceless (2016 film)" hatlink because it contravenes Wikipedia policy at WP:NAMB, which gives as a case of an improper hatlink being a hatlink which is "disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous". "Priceless (2006 film)" is not ambiguous because the year is already specified in the article title. Additionally, there is already a main disambiguation page at Priceless which lists other films by the same title. Furthermore, using the hatlink for films that are disambiguated by year is contrary to general Wikipedia practice. Examples:

Finally, it is inconsistent to have a hatlink here at Priceless (2006 film) but no equivalent hatlink at Priceless (2016 film), which highlights the problem with hatlinking films disambiguated by year: it would mean including long hatlinks with links cover all other films of the same title in all other years at the beginning of every such film article.

Lowellian (reply) 15:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I put the hatlink back. Not because I disagree with all of the "2006 vs 2016" stuff you mentioned (although, I have no interest in comparing it to other pages which could just as easily be edited or contain their own errors), but because there isn't a dab page listed. Feel free to put a "for other uses of Priceless, click here" if you don't like the current "not to be confused with" that is there. Kellymoat (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]