Talk:Pratt & Whitney R-2000 Twin Wasp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pratt & Whitney R-2000 Twin Wasp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Engines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Displacement[edit]

Bore and stroke yield 1,999.5 cuin, not the 2,004 given. AMCKen (talk) 03:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source? - BilCat (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessarily the displacement that is wrong, you need to find a ref to change this, not a calculator. - Ahunt (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just consulted the Type Certificate Data Sheet which is cited as a ref for the article and it says bore of 5.75" and stroke of 5.5" and displacement of 2004 cu in, so I think you are missing something there in your calculations. The TCDS is an approved engineering document prepared by the manufacturer and approved by the FAA. It is possible there is some error, but it is more likely you are missing some factor. You are going to need to find a very good ref to overturn the TCDS. - Ahunt (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]