This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I created this page about an hour ago. I fail to see how there is even a question as to the notability of an organizational entity of a church which contains thousands of members, and has the deeds to quite a few organizations which currently have wikipedia pages. Note, this article is similar to the Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists article. Just because there are not yet any citations doesn't mean much when I just created it, I'll have more citations on it soon.WikiManOne (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The existance of a similar article (or not existance thereof) is not a valid defense for keeping (or not keeping) another article. Just FYI. -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 18:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this particular administrative division of the church has stand-alone notability or can make a claim to it. The national church organization, sure. Individual churches, maybe, depending on the church. This mid-level administrative division? Unlikely. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]