Talk:Portal 2/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Oddbodz (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
In this review of Portal 2, the criteria that a good article needs. I am able to review this article bevause I have only added one fact and a picture to the article.
Well-written[edit]
I think that the article is well writen. The prose is clear an there are no major grammar or spelling mistakes at the time or writing this review. I also feel that the article meet part 'b' of this criterion including the good layout of it's sections.
Factually accurate and verifiable[edit]
The article has almost 200 diffrent sources which are used for in-line citations. Almost all of these are reliable. There is no content which is likely to be challenged.
Broad in its coverage[edit]
I feel that you would be able to learn almost all you needed to know about the subject from this article. However, this article only focuses on the game of Portal 2 and it's development. Anything else you would need to know has links to it.
Neutrality[edit]
This page dosn't advertise the game. There are no points which would be up for debate that this article takes a side to.
Stable[edit]
At the time of writing there is not - nor has not recently been any edit war(s) taking place.
Illustrated, if possible, by images[edit]
There are many images in this article where they are required. Some are free use and other images (which feature screen shots from the game) have fair use rationals. All images are relevant.
Conclusion[edit]
After reviewing this article, i feel it should be given good article status and with a bit of work, nominated for featured article status.