Talk:Pope John numbering

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

European Microstates: Vatican City Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Mid-importance).

Requested move 1 March 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pope John (numbering) → Pope John numbering – Improper use of disambiguating parenthesis since the numbering dispute would not itself be known simply as "Pope John." Unless anyone can think of a better title for this, removing the brackets is appropriate. Ribbet32 (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support move. This one's as noncontroversial as any Pope-related move can be. ONR (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:DAB; the nominator's analysis is correct. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 22:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per original proposal. I wonder if there's a title that would sound a little less stilted ("Numbering of Popes John?") but the proposed one is probably fine. --Jfruh (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or Pope John numeration? One of my hopes in starting this RM was that we could come up with a less pedestrian title. Ribbet32 (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.